Feature work now goes on feat/<slug> branches; Claude pushes and prints the Gitea compare URL for the user to open the MR. Exceptions documented for small fixes and typo tweaks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
Branch-per-feature + Gitea MR workflow
Context
Until now, Claude has been committing feature work directly to main
(see recent history: feat: Lower adult monthly fee…, feat: Go rewrite M1…,
all on main). The user wants to switch to a branch-per-feature flow with
review via a Gitea merge request, so that:
- Feature work is reviewable as a self-contained diff before it lands.
mainstays releasable.- The change history shows reviewed merges, not unsupervised pushes.
The remote is Gitea (https://gitea.home.hrajfrisbee.cz/kacerr/fuj-management.git),
which supports the standard pull/merge-request flow.
This plan only modifies CLAUDE.md. No code changes.
Scope clarification (from user)
- MR creation method: Claude pushes the branch and prints the Gitea
"compare" URL. The user opens / merges the MR in the browser. No
teaCLI, no API calls. - When the flow applies: Features only. Small bug fixes and hotfixes can
still be committed straight to
main. Claude decides feature-vs-fix based on scope; when uncertain, ask. - Branch naming:
feat/<slug>for features,fix/<slug>for the occasional bug-fix branch the user explicitly requests.<slug>is kebab-case, short, descriptive.
Change
Add a new top-level section to CLAUDE.md titled "Branching & merge requests",
placed immediately before the existing ## Git Commits section so the workflow
context appears before the commit-message convention.
Proposed section content
## Branching & merge requests
The remote is Gitea (`gitea.home.hrajfrisbee.cz/kacerr/fuj-management`).
For **features**, do not commit to `main` directly. Use a branch + merge
request flow:
1. **Create a branch off `main`** before starting work:
- `feat/<slug>` for features (e.g. `feat/qr-code-overlay`)
- `fix/<slug>` for bug-fix branches the user explicitly asks for
- `<slug>` is short kebab-case
2. **Commit on the branch** following the existing commit conventions
(Co-Authored-By trailer, etc.).
3. **Push the branch** to `origin` with `-u` so it tracks.
4. **Print the Gitea compare URL** so the user can open the MR in the
browser:
`https://gitea.home.hrajfrisbee.cz/kacerr/fuj-management/compare/main...<branch>`
Do **not** use `tea`, `gh`, or call the Gitea API — the user opens and
merges the MR themselves.
5. **Do not merge or delete the branch** from the CLI. The user does that
in Gitea.
**Exceptions — when committing straight to `main` is fine:**
- Small bug fixes / hotfixes the user describes as such.
- Typo / comment / formatting tweaks.
- Edits the user explicitly says to push to `main`.
When uncertain whether something is "feature" or "small fix", ask before
committing.
Files to modify
- CLAUDE.md — insert the new
## Branching & merge requestssection just above the existing## Git Commitssection (around line 95).
Verification
- Re-read
CLAUDE.mdand confirm the new section is well-placed and the existing structure (## Git Commits,## Changelog,## Plans) is intact. git diff CLAUDE.mdshould show only an additive change.- No code, tests, or runtime behavior changes — nothing else to test.
- Behavior verification happens on the next feature request: Claude
should create a
feat/<slug>branch, commit there, push, and print the compare URL instead of committing onmain.