fix: include juniors in payment-inference roster

infer_payments was building member_names from get_members_with_fees()
(adults sheet only). Junior-only members were invisible to the matcher,
so a payment message containing an exact junior name would produce a
fuzzy review match against a different adult sharing the same first name.

Fix: union the adult and junior rosters (deduped via canonical_member_key)
so all members are candidates. The existing exact-name short-circuit in
match_members then handles precedence correctly.

Two regression tests added for the Jáchym Kubík / Jáchym Hrušák case.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 2026-05-06 16:38 CEST — fix: include juniors in payment-inference roster
+
+- `scripts/infer_payments.py`: union adults + junior rosters so junior-only members are visible to the matcher.
+- Root cause: `get_members_with_fees()` reads only the adults sheet; junior-only kids like Jáchym Kubík were absent from `member_names`, causing the exact-match short-circuit to never fire and a different adult sharing the first name to win via fuzzy review.
+- Two regression tests added to `tests/test_match_members.py`.
+
 ## 2026-05-06 13:18 CEST — feat(go/M2.7-2.9): port domain/matching package
 
 - New `go/internal/domain/matching` package porting three helpers from `scripts/match_payments.py`.

docs/plans/2026-05-06-1626-infer-payments-junior-roster.md

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+# Include junior members in payment inference roster
+
+## Context
+
+A bank payment from sender `JIŘÍ KUBÍK` with the message
+`Jáchym Kubík: 01/2026+03/2026+04/2026` is being inferred as
+`[?] Jáchym Hrušák (G)` instead of the obvious `Jáchym Kubík`, even though
+the message contains his exact full name.
+
+**Root cause** (confirmed with the user): `Jáchym Kubík` is in the **junior**
+attendance sheet only — he does not appear on the main/adults sheet. But
+[scripts/infer_payments.py:101-102](scripts/infer_payments.py#L101-L102)
+builds `member_names` by calling `get_members_with_fees()`
+([scripts/attendance.py:170](scripts/attendance.py#L170)), which reads only
+`EXPORT_URL` (the adults sheet). Junior-only members are therefore invisible
+to the matcher.
+
+With Kubík absent from `member_names`, the matcher in
+[scripts/match_payments.py:65](scripts/match_payments.py#L65) processes the
+combined text `jiri kubik jachym kubik: 01/2026+03/2026+04/2026` against an
+adults-only roster:
+
+- The exact-full-name short-circuit (`match_payments.py:75-84`) finds nothing —
+  no adult's full name is in the text.
+- Hrušák `(G)` is the only adult with first name `Jáchym`. He fails the
+  auto-rules (his surname isn't in the text) but hits the partial-first-name
+  review rule (`match_payments.py:123-125`) → returned as `("Jáchym Hrušák (G)",
+  "review")`, rendered as `[?] Jáchym Hrušák (G)`.
+
+The user's original framing — "exact match in message should win over
+everything" — is already implemented for any candidate that **is** in the
+roster (the May-04 short-circuit). The bug is upstream: the right candidate
+was never even considered.
+
+**Goal:** make `infer_payments` consider junior members as candidates, so
+junior-only names like `Jáchym Kubík` get matched correctly.
+
+## Approach
+
+Single-file change in [scripts/infer_payments.py](scripts/infer_payments.py).
+
+Replace the adults-only roster lookup with a union of the adult and junior
+rosters. `attendance.py` already exposes both:
+[`get_members_with_fees()`](scripts/attendance.py#L170) for adults (and tier-J
+juniors who train with adults) and
+[`get_junior_members_with_fees()`](scripts/attendance.py#L208) for everyone in
+the junior sheet.
+
+### Edit at [scripts/infer_payments.py:15](scripts/infer_payments.py#L15)
+
+```python
+from attendance import get_members_with_fees, get_junior_members_with_fees
+```
+
+### Edit at [scripts/infer_payments.py:99-102](scripts/infer_payments.py#L99-L102)
+
+```python
+print("Fetching member list for matching...")
+adult_members, _ = get_members_with_fees()
+junior_members, _ = get_junior_members_with_fees()
+
+# Union rosters, preserving first-seen order, deduping by canonical key
+seen: set[str] = set()
+member_names: list[str] = []
+for m in adult_members + junior_members:
+    name = m[0]
+    key = canonical_member_key(name)
+    if key in seen:
+        continue
+    seen.add(key)
+    member_names.append(name)
+```
+
+`canonical_member_key` already lives in
+[scripts/match_payments.py:20](scripts/match_payments.py#L20) — import it
+alongside `infer_transaction_details`. It normalizes diacritics/case/whitespace,
+so `"Maria Maco"` and `"Mária Maco"` collapse to the same key.
+
+### Why downstream reconciliation still works
+
+`reconcile()` is invoked twice per page — once with the adults roster
+([app.py:200](app.py#L200)) and once with the juniors roster
+([app.py:384](app.py#L384)). Each call resolves the `Person` cell against its
+own roster; a junior name resolves cleanly in the juniors call and lands in
+"unmatched" in the adults call. That's already the existing behavior for any
+junior payment manually entered into the `Person` column, so no further
+changes are needed.
+
+### Files to modify
+
+- [scripts/infer_payments.py](scripts/infer_payments.py) — only the
+  import + roster construction. ~10-line change.
+
+### Files to read for confidence (no edits)
+
+- [scripts/attendance.py:208-289](scripts/attendance.py#L208-L289) —
+  `get_junior_members_with_fees` returns `(name, tier, …)` tuples just like
+  the adults version, so `m[0]` works for both.
+- [scripts/match_payments.py:65-137](scripts/match_payments.py#L65-L137) —
+  `match_members` already handles the precedence the user wants (exact full-name
+  short-circuit), so once Kubík is in `member_names`, the case will be auto-matched
+  with no `[?]`.
+
+## Verification
+
+1. **Manual sanity** — re-run inference on the offending row:
+   - Clear `Person`/`Purpose` for the Kubík row in the payments sheet.
+   - `make infer`.
+   - Expect `Person = Jáchym Kubík`, `Purpose = 2026-01, 2026-03, 2026-04`,
+     no `[?]`.
+
+2. **Unit test** — extend
+   [tests/test_match_members.py](tests/test_match_members.py) (or add a small
+   `tests/test_infer_payments.py`) to assert that, given a roster that
+   includes `Jáchym Hrušák (G)` and `Jáchym Kubík`, the message
+   `Jáchym Kubík: 01/2026+03/2026+04/2026` resolves to
+   `[("Jáchym Kubík", "auto")]` only. This is really a regression test for
+   the May-04 short-circuit — the new behavior under test is just that
+   `infer_payments` now feeds in juniors.
+
+3. **Run the suite**: `make test`.
+
+4. **Dashboard smoke** — `make web`, open `/payments`, confirm the row now
+   shows the correct member; open `/juniors`, confirm the payment is
+   credited to Kubík for the three months listed.
+
+5. **Changelog** — once the user confirms the fix, append an entry to
+   [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md) per [CLAUDE.md](CLAUDE.md):
+   `## YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM TZ — fix: include juniors in payment-inference roster`.

scripts/infer_payments.py

@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
 
 from googleapiclient.discovery import build
 from sync_fio_to_sheets import get_sheets_service, DEFAULT_SPREADSHEET_ID
-from match_payments import infer_transaction_details
-from attendance import get_members_with_fees
+from match_payments import infer_transaction_details, canonical_member_key
+from attendance import get_members_with_fees, get_junior_members_with_fees
 
 def parse_czk_amount(val) -> float:
     """Parse Czech currency string or handle raw numeric value."""
@@ -96,10 +96,19 @@ def infer_payments(spreadsheet_id: str, credentials_path: str, dry_run: bool = F
         print(f"Current header: {header}")
         return
 
-    # 2. Fetch members for matching
+    # 2. Fetch members for matching — union adults + juniors so junior-only
+    # members (e.g. kids not on the adult sheet) are visible to the matcher.
     print("Fetching member list for matching...")
-    members_data, _ = get_members_with_fees()
-    member_names = [m[0] for m in members_data]
+    adult_members, _ = get_members_with_fees()
+    junior_members, _ = get_junior_members_with_fees()
+
+    seen: set[str] = set()
+    member_names: list[str] = []
+    for m in adult_members + junior_members:
+        key = canonical_member_key(m[0])
+        if key not in seen:
+            seen.add(key)
+            member_names.append(m[0])
 
     # 3. Process rows
     print("Inferring details for empty rows...")

tests/test_match_members.py

@@ -48,6 +48,25 @@ class TestMatchMembersExact(unittest.TestCase):
         names = [r[0] for r in result]
         self.assertIn("Tomáš Němeček (Tov)", names)
 
+    def test_shared_first_name_junior_in_roster_wins_exact(self):
+        # Regression: two members share first name "Jáchym"; message has full name
+        # of the junior-only member → exact match must win, no [?] on the adult.
+        roster = ["Jáchym Hrušák (G)", "Jáchym Kubík"]
+        result = match_members(
+            "JIŘÍ KUBÍK Jáchym Kubík: 01/2026+03/2026+04/2026", roster
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(result, [("Jáchym Kubík", "auto")])
+
+    def test_shared_first_name_without_junior_in_roster_falls_back(self):
+        # Without Kubík in the roster (old behaviour), Hrušák wins via first-name
+        # partial match — confirms the roster-expansion fix is the real solution.
+        roster = ["Jáchym Hrušák (G)"]
+        result = match_members(
+            "JIŘÍ KUBÍK Jáchym Kubík: 01/2026+03/2026+04/2026", roster
+        )
+        names = [r[0] for r in result]
+        self.assertIn("Jáchym Hrušák (G)", names)
+
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()