config/manager/kustomization.yaml: commit the images: stanza that
`kustomize edit set image` (run by make deploy, including inside make
test-e2e) writes into this tracked file. It showed up as unexplained
drift twice; committing it once ends that -- the edit is idempotent, so
future deploy/e2e runs produce no diff. The example.com image name is
the e2e suite's placeholder default and gets overridden by IMG= on any
real deploy.
Execution log: the Status checklist's Step 3 line still said "Mock
provider" from before the pivot; a fresh session resuming from the
checklist alone would have been misled.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follows the approved lean-down plan
(docs/plans/2026-08-08-1335-lean-scaffold-cleanup.md). Removes from the
application's deployed footprint:
- config/network-policy/ and its commented enable line -- the user does
not need network policies at the moment.
- The webhook-only halves of config/default/kustomization.yaml: the
commented ../webhook and ../certmanager resource lines, the
manager_webhook_patch.yaml reference, the serving-cert ->
Validating/Mutating WebhookConfiguration cainjection replacement
blocks, and the crdkustomizecainjection* scaffold markers -- anchors
only for `kubebuilder create webhook`, which is a permanent non-goal.
- The two commented [WEBHOOK] blocks in config/crd/kustomization.yaml
plus the now-empty patches: key; kept the one-line
crdkustomizeresource marker since `kubebuilder create api` could
legitimately run again.
- config/crd/kustomizeconfig.yaml, whose only consumer was the removed
configurations: block.
Explicitly kept per user direction: all of config/prometheus/, the
paired metrics-TLS-via-cert-manager plumbing (cert_metrics_manager_patch
+ the metrics-certs/ServiceMonitor replacement halves), all RBAC
manifests including the admin/editor/viewer helper roles, and all
developer tooling.
Also records in the execution log why the webhook machinery existed at
all: kubebuilder init emits it unconditionally, verified against the
v4.15.0 binary that no init flag can suppress it -- scaffold-then-prune
is the only supported path, and the pruning pass should have happened
at Step 0.
Verified: kustomize build clean on config/default and config/crd,
go build/vet clean with and without -tags=e2e, make test green with
coverage identical to pre-cleanup.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Full ProxySpec/ProxyStatus/Proxy types per the plan: PlacementSpec,
CloudInitSpec, EndpointSpec, HealthCheckSpec, SecretKeySelector, all
defaults, and 7 CEL XValidation rules enforcing mode/provider
immutability, provider/endpoint required-iff-Managed/External, and
cloud-init exactly-one-of inline/secretRef.
Applies the four corrections identified during planning that would
otherwise be silent bugs: MaxLeases as *int32 (so an explicit 0 survives
Go round-trips instead of re-defaulting to 5), HealthCheck's
default={} marker (so nested defaults apply even when the field is
omitted entirely), MinLength=1 on Provider/CloudInit.Inline (so the CEL
has() checks stay simple), and listType=map on Conditions.
Adds pure helpers (EffectivePort, EffectiveHost, HealthCheckOrDefault,
MaxLeasesOrDefault) with table-driven tests, for use by the health
engine, discovery API, and spec-hash computation in later steps.
Patches the scaffolded placeholder controller test's resource literal to
a schema-valid spec so it survives the new CRD validation — the test
itself is rewritten wholesale in Step 4 alongside the real reconciler.
Regenerated deepcopy and the CRD; make test green (envtest confirmed all
7 CEL rules enforced by a real apiserver).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bootstraps the empty repo into a kubebuilder go/v4 project: group
crawl.example.com, version v1alpha1, kind Proxy (namespaced). Keeps the
existing module path and preserves the repo's Go/testing/changelog
conventions from CLAUDE.md untouched.
Drops the scaffolded GitHub Actions workflows since the remote is Gitea,
not GitHub. Everything else is default kubebuilder output, unmodified,
so later diffs stay reviewable against a known baseline.
Full implementation plan: docs/plans/2026-08-07-1747-proxy-operator.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
