lab1: pin cilium-operator to the control plane; Step 5 verified
Re-check of lab1 after Steps 4-5 (inspector on lab-mgmt, read-only gets on lab1): - Cluster/KCP/MD Available for 13h; no controller errors since bootstrap. - All six autoscaler annotations on lab1-workers (copied to the MachineSet). spec.replicas has no owner: kubectl-client-side-apply owns only clusterName/selector/template, so re-applying lab1.yaml won't fight cluster-autoscaler. - Nodes Ready on v1.35.9; Node/Machine providerIDs match. - Cilium, envoy and CoreDNS healthy. No PDBs in the cluster. Found: cilium-operator (replicas: 1) was scheduled onto the only worker. It is a non-DaemonSet kube-system pod without a PDB, so with CA's default skip-nodes-with-system-pods=true the last worker could never scale to zero (Step 7). The chart already tolerates the control-plane taint, so a nodeSelector on node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane pins it there. - configs/cilium/values.yaml: operator.nodeSelector. - phase-1 doc: Step 5 ticked, Step 4 explains why replicas: 1 isn't enough, new troubleshooting row. - Session note extended with the re-check. Not applied yet: the owner runs helm upgrade with the new values. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Versions: see [versions.md](versions.md). Template build: see [image-builder-pro
|
||||
- [x] Step 2 — management cluster (`ansible/mgmt.yml`: k3s + cluster-api-operator + providers)
|
||||
- [x] Step 3 — workload cluster `lab1` (VMs 102/103, `.31`/`.32`, VIP `.30`)
|
||||
- [x] Step 4 — CNI (Cilium 1.20.2, `configs/cilium/values.yaml`)
|
||||
- [ ] Step 5 — MachineDeployment autoscaling annotations
|
||||
- [x] Step 5 — MachineDeployment autoscaling annotations
|
||||
- [ ] Step 6 — cluster-autoscaler
|
||||
- [ ] Step 7 — scale tests
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -142,8 +142,10 @@ kubectl -n kube-system get pods -o wide # cilium DaemonSet 2/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
- `ipam.mode=kubernetes` uses the pod CIDR from `clusterNetwork` instead of Cilium's `10.0.0.0/8` default.
|
||||
- `operator.replicas: 1`: the default 2 replicas with node anti-affinity put one on a worker, and a
|
||||
kube-system pod without a PDB blocks scale-down to zero.
|
||||
- `operator.replicas: 1` + `operator.nodeSelector` on `node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane`: the
|
||||
default 2 replicas with node anti-affinity put one on a worker, and a kube-system pod without a
|
||||
PDB blocks scale-down to zero. `replicas: 1` alone isn't enough: the single replica was scheduled
|
||||
onto the worker (the chart tolerates the control-plane taint, so the selector pins it there).
|
||||
- kube-proxy stays (kubeadm default); no kube-proxy replacement in this phase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 5 — autoscaling annotations
|
||||
@@ -208,6 +210,7 @@ CPU-bound at 2 pods per 4-core / 4 GiB worker).
|
||||
| CA never scales down | Node `providerID` ≠ Machine `providerID` | compare `kubectl get nodes -o custom-columns=N:.metadata.name,P:.spec.providerID` with `kubectl get machines` |
|
||||
| MD jumps back to old count | `spec.replicas` in manifest re-applied | remove `replicas` |
|
||||
| last worker won't go to 0 | kube-system pods without PDB (`skip-nodes-with-system-pods=true`) | PDB for CoreDNS or `skip-nodes-with-system-pods: false` |
|
||||
| `cilium-operator` runs on a worker despite `operator.replicas: 1` | chart tolerates the CP taint but doesn't prefer the CP; the scheduler picked the worker | `operator.nodeSelector: {node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane: ""}` in `configs/cilium/values.yaml`, `helm upgrade` |
|
||||
| scale-from-zero does nothing | capacity annotations missing/wrong | fix cpu/memory/maximum-pods |
|
||||
| clone fails `unsupported format 'qcow2'` | qcow2 on LVM-thin | remove `format` |
|
||||
| ProxmoxMachine stuck without IP | IPAM pool exhausted | `kubectl get ipaddressclaims`, widen range |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,3 +41,34 @@ creation, Warning events in `default`. `clusterctl describe` failed (403 on CRDs
|
||||
- `.claude/cluster-inspector/rbac.yaml`: CRD read added (for `clusterctl describe`); applied by the
|
||||
next `ansible-playbook mgmt.yml --tags inspector`.
|
||||
- Phase-1 checklist: Step 3 ticked; next Step 4 (Cilium), then Step 5 annotations in `lab1.yaml`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-09-28 00:55 CEST — re-check after Steps 4–5
|
||||
|
||||
**What was checked:** the `cluster-inspector` agent with `lab-mgmt-ro` covered the MD annotations,
|
||||
field managers, Cluster/KCP/MD conditions, IPAM and controller logs. For the workload side, Claude
|
||||
ran read-only `kubectl get` with the owner's admin `~/.kube/lab1.kubeconfig`, because no `lab1-ro`
|
||||
kubeconfig exists yet. The agent refuses admin kubeconfigs when permission is relayed through
|
||||
another agent.
|
||||
|
||||
**Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `lab1` has been stable for 13h. Cluster, KCP and MD are Available, and the controllers have
|
||||
logged no errors since the ~09:00 UTC bootstrap noise.
|
||||
- All six Step 5 annotations are on `lab1-workers` and copied to its MachineSet.
|
||||
- Nothing owns `spec.replicas`: `kubectl-client-side-apply` owns only
|
||||
clusterName/selector/template.
|
||||
- Both nodes are Ready on v1.35.9, and Node providerIDs match the Machines.
|
||||
- Cilium 2/2, envoy 2/2, operator 1/1 and CoreDNS 2/2 (both replicas on the CP) are healthy. No
|
||||
pods are outside Running, and there are no PDBs anywhere.
|
||||
- **`cilium-operator` runs on the worker** despite `operator.replicas: 1`. With CA's default
|
||||
`skip-nodes-with-system-pods=true` and no PDB, it would block Step 7's scale-to-zero. Fixed in
|
||||
`configs/cilium/values.yaml` with a `nodeSelector` on the control-plane role; the owner still
|
||||
has to apply it with `helm upgrade`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Follow-ups:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Owner: `helm upgrade` Cilium with the new values, then confirm the operator runs on
|
||||
`lab1-control-plane-*`.
|
||||
- Owner: mint a `lab1-ro` kubeconfig with `.claude/cluster-inspector/make-kubeconfig.sh`, so that
|
||||
workload checks can go through the agent.
|
||||
- After Step 6: check that only CA / the scale subresource owns `spec.replicas`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user